Reply
New Contributor
Posts: 1
Registered: ‎09-15-2016

CDH on ubuntu 16.04 xenial ?

[ Edited ]

Hi

 

The CDH packages are not available for xenial in http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh5/ubuntu/

Would it be possible to add them ?

 

Thanks !

 

David

Posts: 354
Topics: 162
Kudos: 60
Solutions: 27
Registered: ‎06-26-2013

Re: CDH on ubuntu 16.04 xenial ?

Ubuntu 16.04 is not currently supported but it's on the roadmap. Hang tight!

New Contributor
Posts: 1
Registered: ‎11-07-2016

Re: CDH on ubuntu 16.04 xenial ?

Hey Justin,

 

Any update on this - we could do with this also.

 

Best

 

Stuart

New Contributor
Posts: 2
Registered: ‎06-08-2016

Re: CDH on ubuntu 16.04 xenial ?

Waiting for xenial repo.

New Contributor
Posts: 1
Registered: ‎02-15-2017

Re: CDH on ubuntu 16.04 xenial ?

Is some date for release xenial repo?
New Contributor
Posts: 2
Registered: ‎03-11-2017

Re: CDH on ubuntu 16.04 xenial ?

It's been nearly 6 months since this was originally asked.

 

Is there an ETA for supporting Xenial?

New Contributor
Posts: 2
Registered: ‎03-11-2017

Re: CDH on ubuntu 16.04 xenial ?

Bump
New Contributor
Posts: 3
Registered: ‎04-20-2017

Re: CDH on ubuntu 16.04 xenial ?

With the lates 5.11.0, its mentioned that ubuntu 16.04 xenial is supported.

 

When trying to install. I get this error: 

sudo apt-get update
Hit:1 http://archive.cloudera.com/cm5/ubuntu/xenial/amd64/cm xenial-cm5.11.0 InRelease
Hit:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease [102 kB]
Get:4 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease [102 kB]
Hit:5 https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release xenial InRelease
Hit:6 https://packages.microsoft.com/repos/vscode stable InRelease
Get:7 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports InRelease [102 kB]
Fetched 306 kB in 0s (443 kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: http://archive.cloudera.com/cm5/ubuntu/xenial/amd64/cm/dists/xenial-cm5.11.0/InRelease: Signature by key F36A89E33CC1BD0F71079007327574EE02A818DD uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1)

 

Anyone has any idea on how to get around this?

Announcements