<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: Solution for &amp;quot;Hive Runtime Error while processing row&amp;quot; (only on MR) in Support Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/Solution-for-quot-Hive-Runtime-Error-while-processing-row/m-p/147974#M110503</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I guess that Tez being faster than MR generally depends on the kind of queries you have. But this is what I could see in different customer's projects.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you tell us which version of HDP you use? I acknowledge that Hive views are not as intuitive as MR Web-UI at the beginning but it does not seem that buggy to me. And you can still send the logs as a URL to people of your team.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for diagnosing the bottlenecks, I would recommend you to try to use Swimlane with Tez:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/apache/tez/tree/master/tez-tools/swimlanes"&gt;https://github.com/apache/tez/tree/master/tez-tools/swimlanes&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a graphical tool that will help you to understand which container/vertex is the bottleneck in your query.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:51:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sluangsay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-29T20:51:10Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

