<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: kudu is slower than parquet? in Support Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/kudu-is-slower-than-parquet/m-p/56617#M14068</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If you are under the scale limits consider increasing # of partitions. Impala tends to use one thread per partition when scanning.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 04:30:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mpercy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-28T04:30:34Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

