<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: kudu is slower than parquet? in Support Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/kudu-is-slower-than-parquet/m-p/56648#M14070</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Impala heavily relies on parallelism for throughput so if you have 60 partitions for Kudu and 1800 partitions for Parquet then due to Impala's current single-thread-per-partition limitation you have built in a huge disadvantage for Kudu in this comparison.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let us know if you re-run your comparison test.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 16:38:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mpercy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-28T16:38:01Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

