question Re: kudu is slower than parquet? in Support Questions

question Re: kudu is slower than parquet? in Support Questions https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/kudu-is-slower-than-parquet/m-p/56812#M14071 I have been re-run the test, and kudu perform much better this time(though it's still a little bit slower than parquet), thanks for <a href="https://community.cloudera.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3752">@mpercy</a>'s suggestion.I changed two  things by re-runing the test:1, increase the partitions for the fact table from 60 to 768(affact all queries)2, change the query3.sql 'or' predicate into 'in' predicate, so predicate can push down to kudu(only affact query 3) below is the re-run result:(column 'kudu60' is the previous result, which means the partitions of fact table is 60 ) (column 'kudu768' is the new result, which means the partitions of fact table is 768) <img src="https://community.cloudera.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/3148i79639BA269188307/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999" role="button" title="kudu-parquet2.png" alt="kudu-parquet2.png" />  Mon, 03 Jul 2017 02:57:54 GMT lewiss 2017-07-03T02:57:54Z