<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: name node high availability on hadoop 1.x in Support Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/name-node-high-availability-on-hadoop-1-x/m-p/192710#M154774</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot for your response and the clarification.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 17:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Santanu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-22T17:49:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>name node high availability on hadoop 1.x</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/name-node-high-availability-on-hadoop-1-x/m-p/192708#M154772</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Friends, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have recently started working on hadoop and that too from 2.x onwards. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Also, I do understand the concept of High-Availability of NN in Hadoop 2.x . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But recently someone told me that even on Hadoop 1.x NN HA was possible, because Hadoop 1.x had ZK and QJN . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If so then why most of the articles on web always say NN was SPoF on Hadoop 1.x ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please do let me know the answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanking you &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Santanu&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:43:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/name-node-high-availability-on-hadoop-1-x/m-p/192708#M154772</guid>
      <dc:creator>Santanu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-20T20:43:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: name node high availability on hadoop 1.x</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/name-node-high-availability-on-hadoop-1-x/m-p/192709#M154773</link>
      <description>&lt;A rel="user" href="https://community.cloudera.com/users/26178/sanutopia.html" nodeid="26178"&gt;@Santanu Ghosh&lt;/A&gt;&lt;P&gt;The branch 1.x do not have namenode HA with QJN based. It is production ready and available only from hadoop-2.x. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can refer HDFS-HA umbrella jira, &lt;A href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3278"&gt;HDFS-3278&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:02:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/name-node-high-availability-on-hadoop-1-x/m-p/192709#M154773</guid>
      <dc:creator>kpalanisamy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-21T17:02:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: name node high availability on hadoop 1.x</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/name-node-high-availability-on-hadoop-1-x/m-p/192710#M154774</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot for your response and the clarification.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 17:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/name-node-high-availability-on-hadoop-1-x/m-p/192710#M154774</guid>
      <dc:creator>Santanu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-22T17:49:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

