<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: Does TTL in Hbase require Major Compaction? in Support Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/Does-TTL-in-Hbase-require-Major-Compaction/m-p/214171#M176086</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;So you said:  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"this is actually a &lt;STRONG&gt;really idea&lt;/STRONG&gt; if you've somehow done this, by the way..."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I think you left an adjective out.  I suppose you mean:  &lt;STRONG&gt;bad&lt;/STRONG&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been told by experts at Azure and Hashmap that we don't need to do major compaction and it is currently shut off.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.  We don't do any deletions from our system.  Would this be the reason they say this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.  We have been told that major compaction will block any writes to our tables (we can't have this).  I was told this is untrue at PhoenixCon but when I asked Hashmap, they said that HDInsight has rewritten major compaction and that it blocks writes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.  We want to start using TTL.  If minor compaction deletes these records (that is what I took from above) is major compaction required?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3.  Why is there so much confusion about this?!  Everyone seems to think TTL requires major compaction.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 19:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>juchems_mark_e</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-22T19:42:18Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

