<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: Some nodes are way slower on HDFS scan then the other ones during impala SQL  query in Support Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/Some-nodes-are-way-slower-on-HDFS-scan-then-the-other-ones/m-p/307942#M223418</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;"... or because memory is running low or because the extra scanner threads are not needed to keep up with the consumer from the scan node." is how I should've finished that.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure what happened there, I did hit the main points but truncated the last sentence.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That part of Impala has had a lot of improvements for performance and observability (i.e. more info in the profile) since CDH5.10, FWIW, I'd guess on a later version this wouldn't be a problem or would be easier to debug at least.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 21:09:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tim Armstrong</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-17T21:09:45Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

