<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: Best practice architecture and naming hdfs path names/hive database for dev and test on 1 cluste in Support Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/Best-practice-architecture-and-naming-hdfs-path-names-hive/m-p/58316#M49792</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You can have seprate database on Hive Metastore &amp;nbsp;for all the three enviroments ,plus the HDFS directory structure I would strongly recommend you to have sperate Hadoop clusters for your production . Because you will have 2 or more Hadoop Namenode HA or Resourcemanager HA configured for all the three enviroments maintaining them &amp;nbsp;will be a cubersome if there is going to be heavy load on all the three enviroment on a single Hadoop Clusters&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What you can do is isolate the production from the other two enviroment have a sperate Hadoop clusters .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I assume you are plaining to &amp;nbsp;have a shared Metastore for HIVE / IMPALA .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should also take in to consideration of other eco systems .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if you need more information.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 02:48:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>csguna</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-02T02:48:05Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

