<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: Benchmarks for Flume sink multiport_syslogtcp in Support Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/Benchmarks-for-Flume-sink-multiport-syslogtcp/m-p/96907#M60216</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;@&lt;A href="http://community.hortonworks.com/users/342/sluangsay.html"&gt;Sourygna Luangsay&lt;/A&gt;. We used syslogtcp for our project. Which is struggling for between 500-1000 events / seconds. Looks like multiport_syslogtcp uses Apache Mina (&lt;A href="https://mina.apache.org/"&gt;https://mina.apache.org/&lt;/A&gt;)  having High-performance asynchronous TCP library, which provides better throughput on multicore machines even when using single TCP port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jagatheeshr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-11-12T00:08:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Benchmarks for Flume sink multiport_syslogtcp</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/Benchmarks-for-Flume-sink-multiport-syslogtcp/m-p/96906#M60215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;According to the &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://flume.apache.org/FlumeUserGuide.html#multiport-syslog-tcp-source"&gt;documentation&lt;/A&gt;, the sink multiport_syslogtcp is faster than syslogtcp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anybody some benchmarks that describe that? Please share your experience.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:58:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/Benchmarks-for-Flume-sink-multiport-syslogtcp/m-p/96906#M60215</guid>
      <dc:creator>sluangsay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-11T23:58:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Benchmarks for Flume sink multiport_syslogtcp</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/Benchmarks-for-Flume-sink-multiport-syslogtcp/m-p/96907#M60216</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;@&lt;A href="http://community.hortonworks.com/users/342/sluangsay.html"&gt;Sourygna Luangsay&lt;/A&gt;. We used syslogtcp for our project. Which is struggling for between 500-1000 events / seconds. Looks like multiport_syslogtcp uses Apache Mina (&lt;A href="https://mina.apache.org/"&gt;https://mina.apache.org/&lt;/A&gt;)  having High-performance asynchronous TCP library, which provides better throughput on multicore machines even when using single TCP port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/Benchmarks-for-Flume-sink-multiport-syslogtcp/m-p/96907#M60216</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jagatheeshr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-12T00:08:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

