<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Impala data model in Archives of Support Questions (Read Only)</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Impala-data-model/m-p/38511#M22342</link>
    <description>What's the best approach to follow to structure data files for Impala tables either flat file fully denormalised into a single file vs star schema model? This use case for integration with BI tools like Microstrategy with Impala.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Suresh12</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-16T10:08:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Impala data model</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Impala-data-model/m-p/38511#M22342</link>
      <description>What's the best approach to follow to structure data files for Impala tables either flat file fully denormalised into a single file vs star schema model? This use case for integration with BI tools like Microstrategy with Impala.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Impala-data-model/m-p/38511#M22342</guid>
      <dc:creator>Suresh12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-16T10:08:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Impala data model</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Impala-data-model/m-p/38520#M22343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unless you have a very strong reason to try a different approach&amp;nbsp;I'd recommend the star schema model. The benefit is mostly that this model is so prevalent that I'd expect the integration with third party tools to be more smooth than with other "fancier" approaches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 23:57:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Impala-data-model/m-p/38520#M22343</guid>
      <dc:creator>alex.behm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-09T23:57:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Impala data model</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Impala-data-model/m-p/38552#M22344</link>
      <description>I agree - just that some references were made to say flat file structures are efficient for Hadoop compare to start scheme structure interms of efficient for IO performance. But as you said it's very important to model it in a way it can work with BI tools.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 23:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Impala-data-model/m-p/38552#M22344</guid>
      <dc:creator>Suresh12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-10T23:24:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

