<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: Multihomed? in Archives of Support Questions (Read Only)</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Multihomed/m-p/46457#M43883</link>
    <description>Interesting!&lt;BR /&gt;There is only the overhead to mantain a hosts file.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A real problem is that Cloudera doesn't support multihomed conifigs &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:21:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mimmus</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-19T14:21:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multihomed?</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Multihomed/m-p/46452#M43881</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we got some issues while planning a secure Cloudera cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The situation is as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- All host are &lt;STRONG&gt;multihomed&lt;/STRONG&gt;, i.e. they have two separate IP addresses connected to two separate LANs. One is intended for interaction with the enterprise network and one for intra-cluster traffic. The intra-cluster network is not accessible from the outside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Each IP-address is associated with &lt;STRONG&gt;a separate hostname&lt;/STRONG&gt;, e.g. &lt;A href="http://host-internal.domain.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;host-internal.domain.com&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="http://host-enterprise.domain.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;host-enterprise.domain.com&lt;/A&gt;. The internal hostname is used as primary hostname and used in all Hadoop configurations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The DNS does resolve the hostnames consistent in all networks. There is no way to resolve the same hostname different depending on the network you are in.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I'm planning to set up Kerberos with an AD, that is placed in the enterprise network. I expect to see issues, as hadoop hosts will talk to the KDC via the external address but resolve itself to the internal hostname. I suspect that the&lt;STRONG&gt; Kerberos hostname validation will fail,&lt;/STRONG&gt; as the KDC resolves the external IP to the external hostname.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Do you have any ideas, how to best handle this situation? &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:44:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Multihomed/m-p/46452#M43881</guid>
      <dc:creator>mimmus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-16T10:44:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multihomed?</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Multihomed/m-p/46454#M43882</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I think that the major problem is that the each host have two hostname.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I configure multihomed cluster with AD integration I will:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- assign one hostname for every host&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- internally the hostname resolve to internal IP, via hosts file or via internal DNS. So the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- from outside the hostname resolve to extenal IP, via external DNS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When Cloudera Manager creates the principal for the pairs &amp;lt;service&amp;gt;/&amp;lt;hostname&amp;gt; the hostname is consistent both for internal and external network.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:09:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Multihomed/m-p/46454#M43882</guid>
      <dc:creator>MicheleM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-19T14:09:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multihomed?</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Multihomed/m-p/46457#M43883</link>
      <description>Interesting!&lt;BR /&gt;There is only the overhead to mantain a hosts file.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A real problem is that Cloudera doesn't support multihomed conifigs &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:21:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Multihomed/m-p/46457#M43883</guid>
      <dc:creator>mimmus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-19T14:21:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multihomed?</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Multihomed/m-p/46495#M43884</link>
      <description>Tested now: it works!&lt;BR /&gt;But we prefer to adopt a plain network config to avoid issues in the future.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:30:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Multihomed/m-p/46495#M43884</guid>
      <dc:creator>mimmus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-20T09:30:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

