<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: Flume Agents - do they appear as a port in NETSTAT? in Archives of Support Questions (Read Only)</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Flume-Agents-do-they-appear-as-a-port-in-NETSTAT/m-p/26916#M5726</link>
    <description>It should definitely show up in netstat as a LISTENING port. You could also use 'lsof -iTCP:8989' to confirm if it is listening.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 13:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pdvorak</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-01T13:52:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Flume Agents - do they appear as a port in NETSTAT?</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Flume-Agents-do-they-appear-as-a-port-in-NETSTAT/m-p/26911#M5725</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a Flume Agent running well currently...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;agent1.sources.http-source.type = http&lt;BR /&gt;agent1.sources.http-source.port = 8989&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is doing its job, but I was interested to know why it does not display as an open/listening port via&amp;nbsp;the box standard NETSTAT Linux command?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neil&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Flume-Agents-do-they-appear-as-a-port-in-NETSTAT/m-p/26911#M5725</guid>
      <dc:creator>mcalnd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-16T09:27:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flume Agents - do they appear as a port in NETSTAT?</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Flume-Agents-do-they-appear-as-a-port-in-NETSTAT/m-p/26916#M5726</link>
      <description>It should definitely show up in netstat as a LISTENING port. You could also use 'lsof -iTCP:8989' to confirm if it is listening.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 13:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Flume-Agents-do-they-appear-as-a-port-in-NETSTAT/m-p/26916#M5726</guid>
      <dc:creator>pdvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-01T13:52:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flume Agents - do they appear as a port in NETSTAT?</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Flume-Agents-do-they-appear-as-a-port-in-NETSTAT/m-p/27052#M5727</link>
      <description>Thanks for the second command, this is very useful and a lot simpler to identify than netstat - Cheers!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 11:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Flume-Agents-do-they-appear-as-a-port-in-NETSTAT/m-p/27052#M5727</guid>
      <dc:creator>mcalnd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-06T11:10:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

