<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: Non DFS Used is reported much bigger than bash 'df -h' reports, reducing DFS remaining in Archives of Support Questions (Read Only)</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Non-DFS-Used-is-reported-much-bigger-than-bash-df-h-reports/m-p/62624#M72458</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This problem is HDFS-9530 which has a fix in CDH-5.9.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bouncing the DN instances cleared this issue manually until we upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 22:19:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ScottChris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-08T22:19:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Non DFS Used is reported much bigger than bash 'df -h' reports, reducing DFS remaining</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Non-DFS-Used-is-reported-much-bigger-than-bash-df-h-reports/m-p/62569#M72457</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Seeing this issue on all data nodes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example for one node:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hadoop has its own partition&lt;BR /&gt;bash 'du -h --max-depth=1' in hadoop partition reports 'dn' directory is consuming 207G&lt;BR /&gt;bash 'df -h' reports hadoop partition size 296G, used 208G,Avail 73G, Use% 75%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configured Capacity: 314825441690 (293.20 GB)&amp;nbsp; -- good&lt;BR /&gt;DFS Used: 221825508284 (206.59 GB)&amp;nbsp; -- good&lt;BR /&gt;Non DFS Used: 55394479116 (51.59 GB)&amp;nbsp; -- ??? bash says 1G used outside of 'dn' directory in the partition&lt;BR /&gt;DFS Remaining: 37605454290 (35.02 GB) -- ??? bash says 73G free&lt;BR /&gt;DFS Used%: 70.46%&lt;BR /&gt;DFS Remaining%: 11.94%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fsck reports healthy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;redhat 6.9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5.8.2-1.cdh5.8.2.p0.3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dfs.datanode.du.reserved == 1.96GiB&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how to trouble-shoot ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hdfs dfsadmin -report&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configured Capacity: 1574127208450 (1.43 TB)&lt;BR /&gt;Present Capacity: 1277963063885 (1.16 TB)&lt;BR /&gt;DFS Remaining: 410632669242 (382.43 GB)&lt;BR /&gt;DFS Used: 867330394643 (807.76 GB)&lt;BR /&gt;DFS Used%: 67.87%&lt;BR /&gt;Under replicated blocks: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Blocks with corrupt replicas: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Missing blocks: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Missing blocks (with replication factor 1): 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hdfs fsck /&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total size:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 281353009325 B&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total dirs:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5236&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total files:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 501295&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total symlinks:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 (Files currently being written: 37)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total blocks (validated):&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 501272 (avg. block size 561278 B)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Minimally replicated blocks:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 501272 (100.0 %)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Over-replicated blocks:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 (0.0 %)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Under-replicated blocks:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 (0.0 %)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Mis-replicated blocks:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 (0.0 %)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Default replication factor:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Average block replication:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3.0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Corrupt blocks:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Missing replicas:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 (0.0 %)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Number of data-nodes:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Number of racks:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 17:53:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Non-DFS-Used-is-reported-much-bigger-than-bash-df-h-reports/m-p/62569#M72457</guid>
      <dc:creator>ScottChris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-07T17:53:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non DFS Used is reported much bigger than bash 'df -h' reports, reducing DFS remaining</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Non-DFS-Used-is-reported-much-bigger-than-bash-df-h-reports/m-p/62624#M72458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This problem is HDFS-9530 which has a fix in CDH-5.9.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bouncing the DN instances cleared this issue manually until we upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 22:19:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/Non-DFS-Used-is-reported-much-bigger-than-bash-df-h-reports/m-p/62624#M72458</guid>
      <dc:creator>ScottChris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-08T22:19:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

