<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: HA for Name Node in Archives of Support Questions (Read Only)</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/HA-for-Name-Node/m-p/4585#M769</link>
    <description>Use the Quorum Journal Manager mode. I believe the Wizard also&lt;BR /&gt;recommends use of this mode clearly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The NFS mode was an early way of doing it, but requires the additional&lt;BR /&gt;HA-NFS hardware and the maintenance associated with it and has not&lt;BR /&gt;been popular.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 07:45:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Harsh J</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-04T07:45:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HA for Name Node</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/HA-for-Name-Node/m-p/4571#M768</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am planning to enable HA for my test cluster using Cloudera Manager.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cloudera Manager is helping to enable HA for Name Node in Easy way&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But The Question here is, &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;What method is using for Name Node edits, It means, " is it using Quorum Journal or NFS share edit ?"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bommuraj&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:52:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/HA-for-Name-Node/m-p/4571#M768</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bommuraj Paramaraj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-16T08:52:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA for Name Node</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/HA-for-Name-Node/m-p/4585#M769</link>
      <description>Use the Quorum Journal Manager mode. I believe the Wizard also&lt;BR /&gt;recommends use of this mode clearly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The NFS mode was an early way of doing it, but requires the additional&lt;BR /&gt;HA-NFS hardware and the maintenance associated with it and has not&lt;BR /&gt;been popular.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 07:45:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/HA-for-Name-Node/m-p/4585#M769</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harsh J</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-04T07:45:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA for Name Node</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/HA-for-Name-Node/m-p/4599#M770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'd also highly recommend the usage of the Quorum Journal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In addition to the requirement of having additional NFS infrastructure, NFS itself isn't that reliable and we had several issues with its availability in the past.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 09:34:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/HA-for-Name-Node/m-p/4599#M770</guid>
      <dc:creator>geko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-06T09:34:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA for Name Node</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/HA-for-Name-Node/m-p/52260#M771</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Regarding where to host the 3 journal nodes using QJM:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apache docs (and similarly in Cloudera HA guide) state:&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;The JournalNode daemon is relatively lightweight, so these daemons may reasonably be collocated on machines with other Hadoop daemons, for example NameNodes, the JobTracker, or the YARN ResourceManager&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My 2 NameNode machines are not good candidates for hosting 2 of the 3 daemons due the recommendation that these have a dedicated disk drive. So with those out of the picture, the question circulating around my team is whether we can put these 3 daemons on nodes running data node daemons OR if we should dedicate 3 small virtual machines to running them. To me, 3 new VMs is overkill. Note that we have YARN RM on a datanode as well due to the small size of the cluster. Thanks for your input and if there are better suggestions, please let me know.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 20:45:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/HA-for-Name-Node/m-p/52260#M771</guid>
      <dc:creator>leedabee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-16T20:45:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

