<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: question about keytab content in Archives of Support Questions (Read Only)</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/question-about-keytab-content/m-p/218206#M79443</link>
    <description>&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.hortonworks.com/users/1271/sheltong.html"&gt;Geoffrey Shelton Okot&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;Thanks for your answer.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately for me, it leads to more (inner) questions &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) While the client/Kerberos dialogs are well-described with a non-encrypted secret key for the client (described in Wikipedia), I have not found yet a description explaining how parties agree to work together, when the client side has only an encrypted secret key in a keytab.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) I don't see why things are improved after encrypting the secret key in a keytab. AFAIU one identity could be stolen when copying a keytab, and then, in that case, having, inside the keytab, a secret key, encrypted or not, does not look like to change anything related to keytab copy protection.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some things are still obscure for me.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;About (1) : do you have any link pointing to a protocol detail description when working with an encrypted secret key in a keytab ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:51:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ddv36a78</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-18T21:51:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>question about keytab content</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/question-about-keytab-content/m-p/218204#M79441</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not yet kerberized my Hadoop cluster yet. But, I am wondering about keytab (content).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Originally, I thought a keytab entry is just 1..to..N couples (principal name, secret key &lt;EM&gt;unencrypted&lt;/EM&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, recently, while trying to validate that point of view, I have read, &lt;A href="https://kb.iu.edu/d/aumh" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt; for example, that the secret key is stored &lt;EM&gt;encrypted&lt;/EM&gt;. So, it means then that there should be somewhere a master key to store the keytab's secret in an encrypted form.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, my (simple) questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- How a secret key is stored inside a keytab ? raw (uncrypted) ? encrypted ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- If stored encrypted, what is the master key to crypt keytab's secret ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/question-about-keytab-content/m-p/218204#M79441</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddv36a78</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-16T13:19:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: question about keytab content</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/question-about-keytab-content/m-p/218205#M79442</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href="@Dominique De Vito"&gt; @Dominique De Vito&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When creating the KDC server the database holds the Master key&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;I&gt;The keytab contains pairs of Kerberos principals and keys in the encrypted form &lt;/I&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;I&gt;The Keytab is authenticated the against the Master key in KDC server which is generated using&lt;STRONG&gt; kdb5_util&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;HTH&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 16:57:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/question-about-keytab-content/m-p/218205#M79442</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shelton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-11T16:57:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: question about keytab content</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/question-about-keytab-content/m-p/218206#M79443</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.hortonworks.com/users/1271/sheltong.html"&gt;Geoffrey Shelton Okot&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;Thanks for your answer.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately for me, it leads to more (inner) questions &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) While the client/Kerberos dialogs are well-described with a non-encrypted secret key for the client (described in Wikipedia), I have not found yet a description explaining how parties agree to work together, when the client side has only an encrypted secret key in a keytab.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) I don't see why things are improved after encrypting the secret key in a keytab. AFAIU one identity could be stolen when copying a keytab, and then, in that case, having, inside the keytab, a secret key, encrypted or not, does not look like to change anything related to keytab copy protection.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some things are still obscure for me.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;About (1) : do you have any link pointing to a protocol detail description when working with an encrypted secret key in a keytab ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:51:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/question-about-keytab-content/m-p/218206#M79443</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddv36a78</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-18T21:51:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

