<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>question Re: What's the problem on having dfs.namenode.handler.count configured too high? in Archives of Support Questions (Read Only)</title>
    <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/What-s-the-problem-on-having-dfs-namenode-handler-count/m-p/188807#M83458</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Below the answer in case someone need it:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Each handler (worker) thread consume resources/memory on the NN.
We can not set this value too high because it will consume unnecessary resources and cause extra burden on the NN."&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 01:39:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JLo_Hernandez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-14T01:39:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What's the problem on having dfs.namenode.handler.count configured too high?</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/What-s-the-problem-on-having-dfs-namenode-handler-count/m-p/188806#M83457</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am following Smartsense recommendation to make my cluster operationally more efficient, however there is a lot of documentation on how to set mentioned feature within ambari an why handlers are important for RPC, no one is mentioning why having this feature set "too high" affects a cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone share some thought here?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards!"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 22:43:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/What-s-the-problem-on-having-dfs-namenode-handler-count/m-p/188806#M83457</guid>
      <dc:creator>JLo_Hernandez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-12T22:43:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What's the problem on having dfs.namenode.handler.count configured too high?</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/What-s-the-problem-on-having-dfs-namenode-handler-count/m-p/188807#M83458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Below the answer in case someone need it:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Each handler (worker) thread consume resources/memory on the NN.
We can not set this value too high because it will consume unnecessary resources and cause extra burden on the NN."&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 01:39:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/What-s-the-problem-on-having-dfs-namenode-handler-count/m-p/188807#M83458</guid>
      <dc:creator>JLo_Hernandez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-14T01:39:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What's the problem on having dfs.namenode.handler.count configured too high?</title>
      <link>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/What-s-the-problem-on-having-dfs-namenode-handler-count/m-p/188808#M83459</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is recommended that the RPC handler count is set to 20 * log2(Cluster Size) with an upper limit of 200. Refer more details here : &lt;A href="https://community.hortonworks.com/articles/43839/scaling-the-hdfs-namenode-part-2.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.hortonworks.com/articles/43839/scaling-the-hdfs-namenode-part-2.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 01:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Archives-of-Support-Questions/What-s-the-problem-on-having-dfs-namenode-handler-count/m-p/188808#M83459</guid>
      <dc:creator>apathak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-14T01:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

