Support Questions
Find answers, ask questions, and share your expertise

type references in attributes v.s. relationship

type references in attributes v.s. relationship

Explorer

Before "relationshipDef" is introduced, we model relationship between different entity types through type references in attributes. My understanding is, "relationshipDef" is equivalent to type references in attributes and that it's going to replace type references in attributes in the future. Is my understanding correct?

Is there a way I can specify constraints equivalent to "ownedRef" and "inverseRef" in relationshipDef?