Community Articles

Find and share helpful community-sourced technical articles.
Announcements
Celebrating as our community reaches 100,000 members! Thank you!
Labels (1)
avatar

Test Conducted on:

1) HDP2.3.4

2) Data Size : 1.4 GB

2) Cluster is ideal and not running any other jobs.

Conclusion:

Observed that Zlib is doing more compression than SNAPPY but SNAPPY jobs are completing quicker than ZLib.

Results are here:

Execution Time in Sec:

6293-snappy-zlib-per.png

Disk Usage Comparison:

6295-diskusage.png

8,318 Views
Comments
avatar
Contributor

Thanks for sharing. What query is this ? Is this performance of reads or writes ?

@thejas

I tested with insert script, basically writes.