Support Questions

Find answers, ask questions, and share your expertise
Announcements
Celebrating as our community reaches 100,000 members! Thank you!

Who agreed with this topic

javax.security.auth.login.LoginException: Client not found in Kerberos database (6) - CLIENT_NOT_Fou

avatar
Explorer

Hi,

I am trying to implement Kerberos security on cloudera CDH-5.3.  In kerberos implementation wizard it generates principals for all the services.

The prinicpal generated are as follows - 

 


kadmin.local: listprincs
HTTP/01hw310845.India.ABC.com@INDIA.ABC.COM
K/M@INDIA.ABC.COM
cloudera-scm@INDIA.ABC.COM
hdfs/01hw310845.India.ABC.com@INDIA.ABC.COM
hive/01hw310845.India.ABC.com@INDIA.ABC.COM
hue/01hw310845.India.ABC.com@INDIA.ABC.COM
impala/01hw310845.India.ABC.com@INDIA.ABC.COM
kadmin/01hw310845.india.ABC.com@INDIA.ABC.COM
kadmin/admin@INDIA.ABC.COM
kadmin/changepw@INDIA.ABC.COM
krbtgt/INDIA.ABC.COM@INDIA.ABC.COM
mapred/01hw310845.India.ABC.com@INDIA.ABC.COM
yarn/01hw310845.India.ABC.com@INDIA.ABC.COM
zookeeper/01hw310845.India.ABC.com@INDIA.ABC.COM

 

But when i try to start all the services in the cluster it gives following error -

 

Failed to start namenode.
java.io.IOException: Login failure for hdfs/01hw310845.india.abc.com@INDIA.ABC.COM from keytab hdfs.keytab
at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.loginUserFromKeytab(UserGroupInformation.java:947)
at org.apache.hadoop.security.SecurityUtil.login(SecurityUtil.java:242)
at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.loginAsNameNodeUser(NameNode.java:560)
at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:579)
at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.<init>(NameNode.java:754)
at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.<init>(NameNode.java:738)
at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:1427)
at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1493)
Caused by: javax.security.auth.login.LoginException: Client not found in Kerberos database (6) - CLIENT_NOT_FOUND
at com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule.attemptAuthentication(Krb5LoginModule.java:763)
at com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule.login(Krb5LoginModule.java:584)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.invoke(LoginContext.java:762)
at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.access$000(LoginContext.java:203)
at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext$4.run(LoginContext.java:690)
at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext$4.run(LoginContext.java:688)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.invokePriv(LoginContext.java:687)
at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.login(LoginContext.java:595)
at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.loginUserFromKeytab(UserGroupInformation.java:938)
... 7 more
Caused by: KrbException: Client not found in Kerberos database (6) - CLIENT_NOT_FOUND
at sun.security.krb5.KrbAsRep.<init>(KrbAsRep.java:82)
at sun.security.krb5.KrbAsReqBuilder.send(KrbAsReqBuilder.java:319)
at sun.security.krb5.KrbAsReqBuilder.action(KrbAsReqBuilder.java:364)
at com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule.attemptAuthentication(Krb5LoginModule.java:735)
... 20 more
Caused by: KrbException: Identifier doesn't match expected value (906)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.KDCRep.init(KDCRep.java:143)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.ASRep.init(ASRep.java:65)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.ASRep.<init>(ASRep.java:60)
at sun.security.krb5.KrbAsRep.<init>(KrbAsRep.java:60)
... 23 more

 

The problem seems to be that principal name that cloudera uses to authenticate is in SMALL LETTERS of FQDN while the generated princpals are

in CAPITAL LETTERS.

 

How to ensure that cloudera generates the principals(domain name) from - /etc/host file without converting it into small case

Who agreed with this topic