Is there a difference between installing ambari via the apache docs vs Hortonworks docs?
I assume that the end result is exactly the same since Hortonworks labels the distribution in the docs as "Apache" and the repo they instruct to add uses
apache.org as the package URL:
[root@HW001 ~]# yum info ambari-server
Installed Packages
Name : ambari-server
Arch : x86_64
Version : 2.7.3.0
Release : 139
Size : 418 M
Repo : installed
From repo : ambari-2.7.3.0
Summary : Ambari Server
URL : http://www.apache.org
License : (c) Apache Software Foundation
Description : Maven Recipe: RPM Package.
However, the installation instructions that the ambari project site links to are different and only involve building from source via maven (and seem to nowhere mention installation options via package manager), so gives me pause as to whether these are exactly the same.
Could anyone with more experience here explain this a bit more to me? Is the underlying code any different when getting the same ambari version from Hortonworks vs building from source via the apache docs? And the reason for asking was due to the differences in installation method, yet having both marketed as "Apache".