Our Community is getting an upgrade! To get everything ready for the relaunch, we’ll be placing the site in read-only mode starting September 21st.
We really appreciate your understanding while we get things set up behind the scenes. Catch up on all the exciting details about the move here.
Need help or have questions? Drop us a line at [email protected]
Created 04-18-2017 09:31 AM
Hi,
To clarify the question I will illustrate the case;
Lets name datanodes like; [dnode1, dnode2, dnode3, dnode4, dnode5, dnode6, dnode7, dnode8, dnode9]
I don't want one block to be replicated among dnode1, dnode2 and dnode3 because I have to turn off these 3 at once in case of maintenance. Is there any such replication setting in hdfs so as to specify replication targets instead of random nodes? Like, replication group definition?
Created 04-18-2017 02:46 PM
Hi @Sedat Kestepe, take a look at rack awareness.
https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.7.2/hadoop-project-dist/hadoop-common/RackAwareness.html
Here's how you can configure racks using Ambari
https://docs.hortonworks.com/HDPDocuments/Ambari-2.2.0.0/bk_Ambari_Users_Guide/content/ch03s11.html
HDFS will avoid placing all block replicas in the same rack to avoid data loss in case of a rack failure. You may be able to use this to achieve what you want.
Created 04-18-2017 02:46 PM
Hi @Sedat Kestepe, take a look at rack awareness.
https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.7.2/hadoop-project-dist/hadoop-common/RackAwareness.html
Here's how you can configure racks using Ambari
https://docs.hortonworks.com/HDPDocuments/Ambari-2.2.0.0/bk_Ambari_Users_Guide/content/ch03s11.html
HDFS will avoid placing all block replicas in the same rack to avoid data loss in case of a rack failure. You may be able to use this to achieve what you want.
Created 04-19-2017 01:24 PM
Thank you 🙂