Our Community is getting an upgrade! To get everything ready for the relaunch, we’ll be placing the site in read-only mode starting September 21st.
We really appreciate your understanding while we get things set up behind the scenes. Catch up on all the exciting details about the move here.
Need help or have questions? Drop us a line at [email protected]
Created on 01-30-2018 08:59 AM - edited 09-16-2022 05:48 AM
Hi,
I have a small cluster with 20 nodes, (10 of them has the SSE4.2 in CPU), so I have 20 HDFS DNs, and 10 KUDU tablets servers (10 are common).
When I try to execute the bellow query:
UPDATE t1 SET t1.num = t2.id FROM db1.table1 t1 JOIN db2.table2 t2 WHERE t1.name= t2.name AND t1.active IN (1,2);
Knowing that table1 is a KUDU table and table2 is HDFS/parquet table.
I had this error message:
WARNINGS: Unable to create Kudu client: Not implemented: The CPU on this system (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz) does not support the SSE4.2 instruction set which is required for running Kudu. If you are running inside a VM, you may need to enable SSE4.2 pass-through.
NB: I use CDH v5.12, Impala v2.9 and Kudu v1.4.
Why I had this issue and is there another form to do the same query without problem ?
Thanks in advance.
Created 01-30-2018 02:53 PM
Created 01-30-2018 03:09 PM
Hmm I understand,
Thank you @Todd Lipcon for the answers,
So, now there is no way to do a query like this in a mixed cluster ?!
Else I'll try do a join in an intermediate table before doing the update query to avoid the imbricate join.
Created 01-30-2018 11:08 AM
Created 01-30-2018 12:53 PM
Hi,
All the 10 KUDU tablets servers and also KUDO master server in my cluster supports the SSE4.2 (Ex: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHz, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz...).
And I'm already working with KUDU, and the most of queries are good, also the UPDATE without JOIN (with a HDFS table) works fine.
Also the client of impala daemons where I execute the concerned UPDATE query supported the SSE4.2 feature.
Created 01-30-2018 02:53 PM
Created 01-30-2018 03:09 PM
Hmm I understand,
Thank you @Todd Lipcon for the answers,
So, now there is no way to do a query like this in a mixed cluster ?!
Else I'll try do a join in an intermediate table before doing the update query to avoid the imbricate join.
Created 01-30-2018 04:48 PM