Our Community is getting an upgrade! To get everything ready for the relaunch, we’ll be placing the site in read-only mode starting September 21st.
We really appreciate your understanding while we get things set up behind the scenes. Catch up on all the exciting details about the move here.
Need help or have questions? Drop us a line at [email protected]
Created 05-03-2016 08:42 PM
Created 05-04-2016 06:20 AM
Hi Andrew,
The recommendation is to start with an unsecure cluster and to add levels of protections one by one to allow benchmarking. Overhead will depend of the use of the cluster.
The numbers I have are the following:
- wire encryption inside the cluster: 2x overhead
- data encryption (Ranger KMS): 15%-20% overhead (but I guess it highly depends of what you are encrypting, not sure every single file must be encrypted).
- for Kerberos, Knox and Ranger: this is not significant and it depends of the installation and the use (network performance to KDC, number of Knox gateways, etc). regarding Ranger, since rules are "copied" locally for each service this not significant.
Hope that helps.
Created 05-04-2016 06:20 AM
Hi Andrew,
The recommendation is to start with an unsecure cluster and to add levels of protections one by one to allow benchmarking. Overhead will depend of the use of the cluster.
The numbers I have are the following:
- wire encryption inside the cluster: 2x overhead
- data encryption (Ranger KMS): 15%-20% overhead (but I guess it highly depends of what you are encrypting, not sure every single file must be encrypted).
- for Kerberos, Knox and Ranger: this is not significant and it depends of the installation and the use (network performance to KDC, number of Knox gateways, etc). regarding Ranger, since rules are "copied" locally for each service this not significant.
Hope that helps.
Created 11-14-2019 10:59 PM
Hi,
I can see significant impact on the hive query after implementation of Ranger and using mysql 5.7.
How can we reduce the response time added due to the Ranger.