Our Community is getting an upgrade! To get everything ready for the relaunch, we’ll be placing the site in read-only mode starting September 21st.
We really appreciate your understanding while we get things set up behind the scenes. Catch up on all the exciting details about the move here.
Need help or have questions? Drop us a line at [email protected]

Archives of Support Questions (Read Only)

This is an archived board for historical reference. Information and links may no longer be available or relevant
Announcements
This board is archived and read-only for historical reference. To ask a new question, please post a new topic on the appropriate active board.

Sqoop2 over Sqoop1 in CDH6

avatar
New Member

In the upcoming release of CDH6 Sqoop2 will be deprecated and "substituted" with the old Sqoop1.

What are the technical reasons behind this choice?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

avatar
Champion

Not all the connectors are supported and mostly its a two step process to transfer data from RDBMS to hive / hbase .In my poc testing   performance compared to sqoop2 is not up to the level of sqoop 1 .So i would prefer sqoop 1 more over sqoop 2 is deprecated . 

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1

avatar
Champion

Not all the connectors are supported and mostly its a two step process to transfer data from RDBMS to hive / hbase .In my poc testing   performance compared to sqoop2 is not up to the level of sqoop 1 .So i would prefer sqoop 1 more over sqoop 2 is deprecated .