Support Questions
Find answers, ask questions, and share your expertise
Announcements
Alert: Welcome to the Unified Cloudera Community. Former HCC members be sure to read and learn how to activate your account here.

hdfs dfsadmin -report VS hdfs fsck /

hdfs dfsadmin -report VS hdfs fsck /

New Contributor

hello,

I'm getting a warning regarding some corrupt blocks replicas when using ambari or hdfs dfsadmin -report commands

$ hdfs dfsadmin -report
Configured Capacity: 89582347079680 (81.47 TB)
Present Capacity: 84363014526231 (76.73 TB)
DFS Remaining: 46423774937044 (42.22 TB)
DFS Used: 37939239589187 (34.51 TB)
DFS Used%: 44.97%
Under replicated blocks: 0
Blocks with corrupt replicas: 8
Missing blocks: 0
Missing blocks (with replication factor 1): 0

But when I'm trying to locate them using hdfs fsck / command, it doesn't find anything wrong.

Status: HEALTHY
 Total size:    11520245257654 B (Total open files size: 912343310015 B)
 Total dirs:    1269459
 Total files:   1035091
 Total symlinks:                0 (Files currently being written: 118)
 Total blocks (validated):      1071649 (avg. block size 10750017 B) (Total open file blocks (not validated): 6893)
 Minimally replicated blocks:   1071649 (100.0 %)
 Over-replicated blocks:        0 (0.0 %)
 Under-r



eplicated blocks:       0 (0.0 %)
 Mis-replicated blocks:         0 (0.0 %)
 Default replication factor:    3
 Average block replication:     3.0
 Corrupt blocks:                0
 Missing replicas:              0 (0.0 %)
 Number of data-nodes:          4
 Number of racks:               1
FSCK ended at Wed Jun 13 16:29:25 RET 2018 in 25763 milliseconds

The filesystem under path '/' is HEALTHY

How can I find thoses corrupted replicas and fix them ?

The namenode also tell me that it's ok but I've already encountered some issue when using spark jobs dealing with those files.

2018-06-13 16:30:25,870 INFO  blockmanagement.BlockManager (BlockManager.java:computeReplicationWorkForBlocks(1660)) - Blocks chosen but could not be replicated = 8; of which 0 have no target, 0 have no source, 0 are UC, 0 are abandoned, 8 already have enough replicas.

BR,

2 REPLIES 2

Re: hdfs dfsadmin -report VS hdfs fsck /

Mentor

@olivier brobecker

Have you tried using the below snippet? Look through the output for missing or corrupt blocks (ignore under-replicated blocks for now)

$ hdfs fsck / | egrep -v '^\.+$' | grep -v replica

Once you find a file that is corrupt

$ hdfs fsck /path/to/corrupt/file -locations -blocks -files
Highlighted

Re: hdfs dfsadmin -report VS hdfs fsck /

New Contributor

Yes, already tried that but with no results.

After some time, the hadoop process ends up by correctif the issue by itself but I'm trying to understand where is the difference between the two commands, they should return the same diagnosis.

BR,