@mszurap  Thanks for your detailed explanation this certainly helps. ... View more

@ChrisGe  Appericate your assistacne, I see the below in the logs,   10:04:02.026 PM INFO cc:494 T 00000000000000000000000000000000 P c8d59ba15dbb4578900f597bb48bd9e0 [term 68 FOLLOWER]: Starting pre-election with config: opid_index: -1 OBSOLETE_local: false peers { permanent_uuid: "865af50ae13e4cfabe5719b865d6716a" member_type: VOTER last_known_addr { host: "master1.com" port: 7051 } } peers { permanent_uuid: "c8d59ba15dbb4578900f597bb48ce9e0" member_type: VOTER last_known_addr { host: "master2.com" port: 7051 } } peers { permanent_uuid: "8be74245ecaf4b5baf18b24dbc730922" member_type: VOTER last_known_addr { host: "master3.com" port: 7051 } } 10:04:02.026 PM INFO cc:296 T 00000000000000000000000000000000 P c8d59ba15dbb4578900f597bb48bd9e0 [CANDIDATE]: Term 69 pre-election: Requested pre-vote from peers 865af50ae13e4cfabe5719b865d6716a (master1.com:7051), 8be74245ecaf4b5baf18b24dbc730922 (master3.com:7051) 10:04:02.028 PM INFO cc:310 T 00000000000000000000000000000000 P c8d59ba15dbb4578900f597bb48bd9e0 [CANDIDATE]: Term 69 pre-election: Election decided. Result: candidate lost. Election summary: received 3 responses out of 3 voters: 1 yes votes; 2 no votes. yes voters: c8d59ba15dbb4578900f597bb48bd9e0; no voters: 865af50ae13e4cfagh5719b865d6716a, 8be74245ecaf4b5baf18b24dbc730922 10:04:02.028 PM INFO cc:2592 T 00000000000000000000000000000000 P c8d59ba15dbb4578900f597bb48bd9e0 [term 68 FOLLOWER]: Leader pre-election lost for term 69. Reason: could not achieve majority   Thanks  ... View more

@ChrisGe    Cannot attach ksck report due to company infosec policy. Regarding consensus matrix is the below you are looking for ??   All reported replicas are: A = 865af50ae13e4cfagh5719b865d6716a B = c8d59ba15dbb4578900f597bb48bd9e0 C = 8be74245ecaf4b5baf18b24dbc7318ea The consensus matrix is: Config source | Replicas | Current term | Config index | Committed? ---------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------ A | A* B C | 68 | -1 | Yes B | A B C | 68 | -1 | Yes C | A* B C | 68 | -1 | Yes   ... View more

Balancer would not be possible, any idea on VIP /Scan IP?  ... View more

Hi @ShankerSharma  I am currently killing the query from Impala GUI, however, this becomes overkill when there are many queries in a state of exception. Was wondering if there could be a faster way to select all of such queries and kill them in one go.     ... View more