Member since
11-17-2021
1163
Posts
261
Kudos Received
30
Solutions
My Accepted Solutions
| Title | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 388 | 04-23-2026 02:02 PM | |
| 944 | 03-17-2026 05:26 PM | |
| 6207 | 11-05-2025 10:13 AM | |
| 1134 | 10-16-2025 02:45 PM | |
| 1900 | 10-06-2025 01:01 PM |
07-15-2024
07:11 AM
I don't know how, but I resolved the issue. For some reason i've to install Ranger RMS, but on the host where I've Ranger i don't have enough RAM to take both Ranger and Ranger RMS. So I've migrated Ranger to a new host with enough RAM to run both, and during the migration i've got an error because Postgre reached the maxinum active connection. Later that, the issue was fixed... So i think the cause was the DB
... View more
07-12-2024
10:18 AM
For jslt , like I said sometimes its easier to write and work with specially if you are trying to get\aggregate data from heavily nested structure. The other advantage jslt has its ability to traverse nested levels dynamically using recursive function calls for example lets say you are working with json structure but have no idea how many nested level it might have (see my json\jslt answer in the this post to get an idea what I mean by that ). On the other hand jolt appears to perform a little bit better in comparison but they are very close. In regards to your question you use the follow to extract single value for the path name: "@(2,values[0])": "paths.[&5].pathName"
... View more
07-11-2024
03:44 AM
1 Kudo
Not sure why do you need to use the replace text processor in this case. I provided that in my sample above as an example anda a way to simulate getting new data by replacing the original content with something else. You can think of replaceText as if Im doing InvokeHttp and getting different flowfile content in the response releationship. If you got the data from module C just link directly to the join enrichment. As long as you have the correct writer\reader configured for each fork then you should be good.
... View more
07-11-2024
01:55 AM
Hi @MoatazNader Yes, you can create/update/delete the iceberg table data using Impala in CDP 7.1.9 Creating table: https://docs.cloudera.com/cdp-private-cloud-base/7.1.9/iceberg-how-to/topics/iceberg-table-creation.html Insert Data: https://docs.cloudera.com/cdp-private-cloud-base/7.1.9/iceberg-how-to/topics/iceberg-insert-table-data.html Update/Delete: https://docs.cloudera.com/cdp-private-cloud-base/7.1.9/iceberg-how-to/topics/iceberg-best-practice-row-modifications.html Reference: https://docs.cloudera.com/cdp-private-cloud-base/7.1.9/iceberg-how-to/topics/iceberg-table-creation.html
... View more
07-09-2024
11:36 AM
@bigluman Has the reply helped resolve your issue? If so, please mark the appropriate reply as the solution, as it will make it easier for others to find the answer in the future. Thanks.
... View more
07-09-2024
03:18 AM
1 Kudo
@uinn Help us in letting know the heap size set for both Hive and Hive Metastore services. Is the issue happens while executing few specific queries or continuously the pause (JVM pause) is happening? Is it appears at HiveMetastore or at Hiveserver2 level?
... View more
07-02-2024
11:54 PM
1 Kudo
Yes, almost same behavior is observed with retry strategy as "penalize". Just the additional penalty duration gets added into the time. For example by default the penalty duration is 30 secs, if incoming flow files are 10 and number of retries is 1. For this case 10 flow files are clubbed up and first retry happens at 50secs. Then for 30secs it penalizes the clubbed flow files. Then after 50secs it goes into the failure relationship. So, In total (numberOfRetries+1)*5secs*(numberOfInComingFlowFiles) + Penalty duration time taken by publishKafka processor to route file into failure relationship in case of penalize retry policy. If retry is not checked then similar behavior like yield is observed 5*numberOfIncomingFlowFiles secs to route to failure relationship as shown in photos. Penalty and yield settings are default only. target kafka version is 3.4.0 and number of partition is 1. Number of nifi nodes are 3. Number of concurrent Tasks on PublishKafkaRecord is 1, but the execution is on all nodes, which is I think 1 thread on 3 nodes each.
... View more
07-02-2024
05:16 AM
I tried so much, to fix that Problem. I also copied the whole nifi-2.0.0-M1 Folder to a new Computer but i have always the same Problem. Maximum Value is not increasing, just counting up bei 1.
... View more
07-01-2024
10:28 AM
@kaif Has the reply helped resolve your issue? If so, please mark the appropriate reply as the solution, as it will make it easier for others to find the answer in the future. Thanks.
... View more
07-01-2024
10:27 AM
@NidhiPal09 Has the reply helped resolve your issue? If so, please mark the appropriate reply as the solution, as it will make it easier for others to find the answer in the future. Thanks.
... View more