hi @rki_ ,    cool!   so, by my understanding;   if I separate the datanodes in the two physical racks, as shown in the image below, the blocks will be replicated to all datanodes in the two racks, right?     with that, if rack_01 goes down, I won't have any data loss, right? ... View more

hi @cjervis  I had already read this documentation before   thank you for your help.   i really wanted to know, if two racks are enough or the recommended one would be 3 ... View more

OK! @Juanes 😉 thanks for the clarification. ... View more

hi @Juanes,    accessing a tablet server on port 8050 and checking the tablets, found more than 30 tablet id with the same name, each tablet id was using 4.4GB disk size   in this case, according to cloudera's documentation, a tablet can have a maximum of 50GB, the size of the tablet id that was found is within the recommended range, right? ... View more

hi @Juanes ,    great!   So, let's assume I have a 500GB table and that table was created with 240 tablets, would that value be within the recommended range?   other point!   I'm using the following calculates as an example:   DATA_SIZE = (value taken from the graph "total_kudu_on_disk_size_across_kudu_replicas") NUM_REPLICAS = RF * Total Tablets (value taken from the ksck command) TABLET_SIZE = DATA_SIZE / NUM_REPLICAS   DATA_SIZE = 147G (converted to bytes, getting "157840048128") NUM_REPLICAS = 3 * 240 = 360   Name | RF | State | Total Tablets | Healthy | Recovering | Underreplicated | not available impala::DATABASE01.TABLE01 | 3 | HEALTHY | 240 | 240 | 0 | 0 | 0   TABLET_SIZE = 157840048128 / 720 = 219222289 (which equals 2.04GB)   the end result was 2.04GB, does that mean each tablet has 2.04GB? ... View more