Our Community is getting an upgrade! To get everything ready for the relaunch, we’ll be placing the site in read-only mode starting September 21st.
We really appreciate your understanding while we get things set up behind the scenes. Catch up on all the exciting details about the move here.
Need help or have questions? Drop us a line at [email protected]

Archives of Support Questions (Read Only)

This is an archived board for historical reference. Information and links may no longer be available or relevant
Announcements
This board is archived and read-only for historical reference. To ask a new question, please post a new topic on the appropriate active board.

Which storage format is optimum for training machine learning models and running iterative processes?

avatar

Assuming a data pipeline will be loading hive tables as spark dataframes. Which storage format is optimum for training machine learning models and running iterative processes? Row based (text, Avro) or column based (Orc, Parquet) files?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

avatar
Master Guru

ORC and Parquet are optimized for OLAP queries since only a subset of the columns from the source tables are used. Avro and other row based perform better if you have to look at entire record. Hav from one datatype to another (multi-hive table approach) is a common practice to determine which format performs the best for your use case. Performance test all three types is my recommendation. There is no one size fits all.

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1

avatar
Master Guru

ORC and Parquet are optimized for OLAP queries since only a subset of the columns from the source tables are used. Avro and other row based perform better if you have to look at entire record. Hav from one datatype to another (multi-hive table approach) is a common practice to determine which format performs the best for your use case. Performance test all three types is my recommendation. There is no one size fits all.