- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content
Created on 08-05-2016 11:40 PM - edited 08-17-2019 10:57 AM
Test Conducted on:
1) HDP2.3.4
2) Data Size : 1.4 GB
2) Cluster is ideal and not running any other jobs.
Conclusion:
Observed that Zlib is doing more compression than SNAPPY but SNAPPY jobs are completing quicker than ZLib.
Results are here:
Execution Time in Sec:
Disk Usage Comparison:
Created on 08-06-2016 07:48 PM
- Mark as Read
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for sharing. What query is this ? Is this performance of reads or writes ?
Created on 08-10-2016 03:29 PM
- Mark as Read
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I tested with insert script, basically writes.