Support Questions
Find answers, ask questions, and share your expertise
Announcements
Alert: Welcome to the Unified Cloudera Community. Former HCC members be sure to read and learn how to activate your account here.

Can Spark SQL replaces Sqoop for Data Ingestion?

Solved Go to solution
Highlighted

Can Spark SQL replaces Sqoop for Data Ingestion?

New Contributor
 
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Re: Can Spark SQL replaces Sqoop for Data Ingestion?

Expert Contributor

If the question is academic in nature then certainly, you can.

If it's instead a use-case and if I were to choose between Sqoop and SparkSQL, I'd stick with Sqoop. The reason being Sqoop comes with a lot of connectors which it has direct access to, while Spark JDBC will typically be going in via plain old JDBC and so will be substantially slower and put more load on the target DB. You can also see partition size constraints while extracting data. So, performance and management would certainly be a key in deciding the solution. 

 

Good Luck and let us know which one did you finally prefer and how was your experience. Thx

2 REPLIES 2

Re: Can Spark SQL replaces Sqoop for Data Ingestion?

Expert Contributor

If the question is academic in nature then certainly, you can.

If it's instead a use-case and if I were to choose between Sqoop and SparkSQL, I'd stick with Sqoop. The reason being Sqoop comes with a lot of connectors which it has direct access to, while Spark JDBC will typically be going in via plain old JDBC and so will be substantially slower and put more load on the target DB. You can also see partition size constraints while extracting data. So, performance and management would certainly be a key in deciding the solution. 

 

Good Luck and let us know which one did you finally prefer and how was your experience. Thx

Re: Can Spark SQL replaces Sqoop for Data Ingestion?

New Contributor
Thanks a lot!

Finally, Sqoop.. :-)