Support Questions

Find answers, ask questions, and share your expertise

Non DFS Used is reported much bigger than bash 'df -h' reports, reducing DFS remaining

avatar
Contributor

Seeing this issue on all data nodes.

 

Example for one node:

 

hadoop has its own partition
bash 'du -h --max-depth=1' in hadoop partition reports 'dn' directory is consuming 207G
bash 'df -h' reports hadoop partition size 296G, used 208G,Avail 73G, Use% 75%

 

Configured Capacity: 314825441690 (293.20 GB)  -- good
DFS Used: 221825508284 (206.59 GB)  -- good
Non DFS Used: 55394479116 (51.59 GB)  -- ??? bash says 1G used outside of 'dn' directory in the partition
DFS Remaining: 37605454290 (35.02 GB) -- ??? bash says 73G free
DFS Used%: 70.46%
DFS Remaining%: 11.94%

 

fsck reports healthy

 

redhat 6.9

5.8.2-1.cdh5.8.2.p0.3

 

dfs.datanode.du.reserved == 1.96GiB

how to trouble-shoot ?

 

thanks.

 

hdfs dfsadmin -report

Configured Capacity: 1574127208450 (1.43 TB)
Present Capacity: 1277963063885 (1.16 TB)
DFS Remaining: 410632669242 (382.43 GB)
DFS Used: 867330394643 (807.76 GB)
DFS Used%: 67.87%
Under replicated blocks: 0
Blocks with corrupt replicas: 0
Missing blocks: 0
Missing blocks (with replication factor 1): 0

 

hdfs fsck /

 Total size:    281353009325 B
 Total dirs:    5236
 Total files:   501295
 Total symlinks:                0 (Files currently being written: 37)
 Total blocks (validated):      501272 (avg. block size 561278 B)
 Minimally replicated blocks:   501272 (100.0 %)
 Over-replicated blocks:        0 (0.0 %)
 Under-replicated blocks:       0 (0.0 %)
 Mis-replicated blocks:         0 (0.0 %)
 Default replication factor:    3
 Average block replication:     3.0
 Corrupt blocks:                0
 Missing replicas:              0 (0.0 %)
 Number of data-nodes:          5
 Number of racks:               1

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

avatar
Contributor

This problem is HDFS-9530 which has a fix in CDH-5.9.0.

 

Bouncing the DN instances cleared this issue manually until we upgrade.

 

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1

avatar
Contributor

This problem is HDFS-9530 which has a fix in CDH-5.9.0.

 

Bouncing the DN instances cleared this issue manually until we upgrade.