Sadly, no. In general, the smaller the blueprint the lesser the chances of breaking compatibility. Let me explain a bit as its not an intention to break backward compatibility. At a very high level, blueprint contains a) components and their layout, b) config settings that are Ambari influenced, c) config settings that are stack influenced, and d) templates for *-env/sh files etc.
In general,
* (a) remains backward compatible even through major releases.
* (b) and (c) should remain backward compatible unless some config cleanup is performed e.g. created new configs for env/log4j files, cleaned up how heap sizes are specified - rare
* (d) includes scripts - these can go through bug fixes for any release
So if you have a blueprint with primarily (a) and only the configs for which you want to over-write the default it should remain backward compatible. The biggest hurdle you can run into is that when you export a blueprint it does not export a minimal blueprint - rather a blueprint with all sections including (d).