Our Community is getting an upgrade! To get everything ready for the relaunch, we’ll be placing the site in read-only mode starting September 21st.
We really appreciate your understanding while we get things set up behind the scenes. Catch up on all the exciting details about the move here.
Need help or have questions? Drop us a line at [email protected]

Archives of Support Questions (Read Only)

This is an archived board for historical reference. Information and links may no longer be available or relevant
Announcements
This board is archived and read-only for historical reference. To ask a new question, please post a new topic on the appropriate active board.

Who agreed with this solution

avatar

1) If you didn't set a memory limit for the query then the query may expand up to the process memory limit. I.e. the query memory limit is effectively process memory limit. This is a pretty bad configuration for concurrent queries since the queries end up fighting it out for memory.

 

2) To answer your CM question directly, you can get the relevant metrics from the timeseries API. tcmalloc_physical_bytes_reserved_across_impalads is the process consumption and mem_tracker_process_limit_across_impalads is the limit. If you paste this into the Chart Builder you can see the averages of the two: SELECT tcmalloc_physical_bytes_reserved_across_impalads, mem_tracker_process_limit_across_impalads WHERE entityName = "IMPALA-1" AND category = SERVICE

 

I'm wondering though if setting up admission control with resource pools and default query memory limits would solve your problem better thana custom solution: https://www.cloudera.com/documentation/enterprise/latest/topics/impala_admission.html

View solution in original post

Who agreed with this solution