@yazeed salem - Please correct me if my below understanding of what you are asking is not correct: - There is no way to click on an existing connection with queued data and select/copy the queued FlowFiles from that connection to another connection. - If you want to join to different connections together, you can use a "funnel". With the processors on both ends of a connection stopped, you will be able to click on that connection and drag the small blue square at destination side of connection to another end-point. This will cause any connections feeding into the funnel to be funneled into a common destination queue. - Thank you, Matt - When an "Answer" addresses/solves your question, please select "Accept" beneath that answer. This encourages user participation in this forum. ... View more

@John T - Many factors go in to determining the correct hardware configuration. Most of which comes from the size or you data, amount of data, and specific processors used in your dataflow and how they are configured. - What I can tell you is running NiFi with a 300 GB configured heap is probably not the best idea. At a heap of that size, even partial garbage collection events could result in considerable stop-the-world times. - I would tend to lean more towards the smaller VMs to make better use of your hardware resources, but again that is based on very little knowledge of your specifics. Best to standup a small VM like you described and perform some load testing on your specific dataflows to determine how much data each VM could potentially process and scale from there on how many nodes you will actually need. - Also keep in mind that the memory used by NiFi's dataflows can and often does extend beyond just heap. Make sure you do not allocate to much memory to each VMs heap which may result in server issues due to insufficient memory for the OS and not heap related processing. (For example: think along the lines of OS level socket queues, externally issued commands and any scripting based processors you may use) - NiFi clusters in the range of 40 nodes is fairly uncommon; however, NiFi doe snot put a restriction on the number of nodes you can have in a cluster. Just make sure that as your increase the number of nodes you make adjustments to the Cluster node properties to maintain cluster stability. Most specifically nifi.cluster.node.connection.timeout (60 secs or higher), nifi.cluster.node.read.timeout (60 seconds or higher), and nifi.cluster.protocol.heartbeat.interval (20 seconds or higher). - As far as GC goes, the default G1GC has proven to be good performer. I have heard of some rare corner cases that can cause some stability issues and users have resolved that by commenting out the G1GC line in nifi bootstrap.conf file and just going with the default GC in the latest versions of Java. - Hope this information was useful for you, Matt ... View more

@Frank Gaibler - The RPG works in the following way: 1. User configures RPG with target NiFi URL (Optional: if target is a NiFi cluster a comma separated list of each node's URL can be provided). User decides if HTTP or RAW transport protocols will be used. 2. Upon clicking "ADD", the RPG will try connecting to the target NiFi in order to retrieve Site-to-Site (S2S) details. These details include things like the number of nodes, node connection info, available remote input/output ports, and current load on each node (if target is cluster) ---- Up to this point it sounds like you are working ---- The node connection information is what matter to you here and it comes from the following properties. The properties you need to be most concerned with are: 1. nifi.remote.input.host= <-- here you can explicitly define the hostname you want sent back to any client requesting a S2S connection. It is this hostname that will be used by the configured transport protocol. leaving this blank will result in Java trying to determine the hostname and in many case this can lead to an internal hostname or even localhost being used. 2. nifi.remote.input.socket.port= <-- If RAW transport protocol is selected, this is the port all FlowFile transmission will occur over. Make sure it is open through any firewalls. - Thanks, Matt - When an "Answer" addresses/solves your question, please select "Accept" beneath that answer. This encourages user participation in this forum. ... View more

@Pierric Ruchier - My initial thought would be to use the PutDistributedMapCache and FetchDistributedMapCache processors. - You would nee to setup a flow that uses a GenerateFlowFile and PutDistributedMapCache processors to created the initial cache entry with a value of "0". - Then in your main flow, Generate a FlowFile (how ever you want to routinely trigger main flow) --> FetchDistributedMapCache (retrieve current cached value) --> make request based on cached value retrieved --> PutDistributedMapCache (update stored cached value with new timestamp) --> rest of flow... - This gives you a way to constantly update a value in cache that can be used. - Thanks, Matt - When an "Answer" addresses/solves your question, please select "Accept" beneath that answer. This encourages user participation in this forum. ... View more