Member since
03-06-2020
398
Posts
54
Kudos Received
35
Solutions
My Accepted Solutions
Title | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|
95 | 11-21-2024 10:12 PM | |
829 | 07-23-2024 10:52 PM | |
1078 | 05-16-2024 12:27 AM | |
3022 | 05-01-2024 04:50 AM | |
1337 | 03-19-2024 09:23 AM |
03-04-2024
04:18 AM
1 Kudo
hi @ChethanYM Thank you for your attention At the time I opened this question in the community, I made a calculation and the values ended up matching what was being predicted.
... View more
03-04-2024
03:30 AM
1 Kudo
@vhp1360 Given the behavior you've observed with different batch sizes and column counts, it's possible that there is a memory or resource constraint causing the error when dealing with a large number of columns and rows. Here are some potential causes and troubleshooting steps to consider: Memory Constraints: Loading a dataset with 200 columns and 20 million rows can require a significant amount of memory, especially if each column contains large amounts of data. Ensure that the system running IBM DataStage has sufficient memory allocated to handle the processing requirements. Configuration Limits: Check if there are any configuration limits or restrictions in the IBM DataStage or Hive connector settings that might be causing the issue. For example, there could be a maximum allowed stack size or buffer size that is being exceeded when processing large datasets. Resource Utilization: Monitor the resource utilization (CPU, memory, disk I/O) on the system running IBM DataStage during the data loading process. High resource utilization or contention could indicate a bottleneck that is causing the error. Optimization Techniques: Consider optimizing the data loading process by adjusting parameters such as batch size, record count, or buffer size. Experiment with different configurations to find the optimal settings that can handle the larger dataset without encountering errors. Data Format Issues: Verify that the data format and schema of the dataset are consistent and compatible with the Hive table schema. Data inconsistencies or mismatches could potentially cause errors during the loading process. Regards, Chethan YM
... View more
03-04-2024
03:01 AM
1 Kudo
@muneeralnajdi The issue you're encountering with the Hive external table, where it fails when using COUNT(*) or WHERE clauses, seems to be related to the custom input format not being properly utilized during query execution. This can lead to errors when Hive attempts to read the files using the default input format. Ensure Custom Input Format is Used: Verify that the custom input format (CustomAvroContainerInputFormat) is correctly configured and loaded in the Hive environment. Confirm that the JAR containing the custom input format class is added to the Hive session or cluster, and that there are no errors or warnings during the JAR loading process. Check Table Properties: Ensure that the custom input format class is correctly specified in the table properties (INPUTFORMAT), and that there are no typos or syntax errors in the table definition. Test with Basic Queries: Start with basic queries (SELECT *) to ensure that the custom input format is properly utilized and data can be read from the Avro files(I think it is working). If basic queries work fine but more complex queries fail, it may indicate issues with the input format's compatibility with certain Hive operations. Consider Alternative Approaches: If troubleshooting the custom input format does not resolve the issue, consider alternative approaches for filtering the files based on their format. For example, you could pre-process the data to separate Avro and JSON files into different directories or partitions, or use other techniques such as external scripts or custom SerDes to handle different file formats within the same directory. Regards, Chethan YM
... View more
03-04-2024
02:14 AM
1 Kudo
@BrianChan Cluster Average Utilization Calculation: The cluster average utilization during HDFS rebalancing is typically calculated based on the configured capacity of the cluster. The configured capacity represents the total storage capacity allocated to the HDFS cluster as defined in the cluster's configuration settings. Individual Utilization Calculation: Individual utilization during HDFS rebalancing is usually calculated based on the sum of DFS used and remaining space for each datanode. This calculation provides an accurate representation of how much storage is currently being utilized on each datanode and how much space is available for additional data storage. Difference in File Moving Size: The difference between the initially reported file moving size and the actual file moving size in the balancer log can occur due to various factors. These may include changes in data distribution across datanodes during the rebalancing process, optimizations performed by the balancer algorithm, or adjustments made based on real-time cluster conditions and performance considerations. Exceeding DataNode Balancing Bandwidth: While the datanode balancing bandwidth is configured to limit the amount of data transferred between datanodes per second during HDFS rebalancing, it's possible for the actual bandwidth consumption to exceed this limit under certain circumstances. Factors such as network congestion, variations in data transfer rates, or optimizations performed by the balancer algorithm can contribute to bandwidth consumption exceeding the configured limit. Regards, Chethan YM
... View more
03-04-2024
02:06 AM
1 Kudo
@Shivakuk When you replace a disk in an HDFS cluster, especially if it's a DataNode disk, the Hadoop system should handle data replication and rebalancing automatically. This means that once the new disk is added and the DataNode is back online, HDFS will redistribute the data across the cluster to maintain the configured replication factor. If data was wiped during or after the disk replacement process, it's critical to investigate why this occurred and take measures to prevent data loss in the future. Ensure that proper backup and recovery procedures are in place, and consider implementing data mirroring or replication to minimize the risk of data loss due to hardware failures. Regards, Chethan YM
... View more
03-03-2024
11:31 PM
@Timo, Did the response assist in resolving your query? If it did, kindly mark the relevant reply as the solution, as it will aid others in locating the answer more easily in the future.
... View more
02-12-2024
09:03 PM
1 Kudo
@Sokka, Did the response assist in resolving your query? If it did, kindly mark the relevant reply as the solution, as it will aid others in locating the answer more easily in the future.
... View more
11-29-2023
10:16 PM
@MinhTruong, Has the reply helped resolve your issue? If so, please mark the appropriate reply as the solution, as it will make it easier for others to find the answer in the future. If you are still experiencing the issue, can you provide the information @ChethanYM has requested?
... View more
10-04-2023
01:09 PM
@Hanro As this is an older post, you would have a better chance of receiving a resolution by starting a new thread. This will also be an opportunity to provide details specific to your environment that could aid others in assisting you with a more accurate answer to your question. You can link this thread as a reference in your new post. Thanks.
... View more
09-13-2023
07:00 AM
Hello @hebamahmoud If the issue is has been from any of the above responses, Could you accept it as a solution? Regards, Chethan YM
... View more