Member since
07-20-2016
4
Posts
0
Kudos Received
0
Solutions
07-21-2016
03:41 AM
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and direction of evolution. Agree WebHDFS is way better performant than httpfs
... View more
07-21-2016
03:38 AM
Agree to your answer and your are spot on on the HTTP server performance implications. WebHDFS is really temping given that we can expose HDFS on a browser with minimal coding ad ability to integrate to non java clients as well. Do share if you get your hands on some benchmark performance numbers. Thanks!!!
... View more
07-20-2016
05:18 PM
Could anyone share the performance differences between Webhdfs and Native Java clients. We are creating a webservice end point to ingest an attachment on to HDFS. The files are typically in <10 MB range. Found http://randomlydistributed.blogspot.com/2012/01/webhdfs-performance.html http://wittykeegan.blogspot.com/2013/10/webhdfs-vs-native-performance.html and my test results nearly match with second link. However wanted to see if any benchmark studies exist.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Apache Hadoop