@stephane_davy Sorry I couldn't work on this further last week. Now my solution looks like this. JSON from GenerateFlowFile [
{
"myfield": "JustForHavingJson",
"myfield1": "A"
},
{
"myfield": "JustForHavingJson",
"myfield1": "B"
},
{
"myfield": "JustForHavingJson",
"myfield1": "C"
},
{
"myfield": "JustForHavingJson",
"myfield1": "D"
},
{
"myfield": "JustForHavingJson",
"myfield1": "E"
},
{
"myfield": "JustForHavingJson",
"myfield1": "X"
},
{
"myfield": "JustForHavingJson",
"myfield1": ""
}
] Definitions of ControllerServices and AvroSchemaRegistry ControllerServices and AvroSchemaRegistry Flow Flow Details of RecordProcessing-Processors Details RecordProcessing-Processors Result FF-Content after MergeRecord: {"myfield":"JustForHavingJson","myfield1":"A","myfield2":"C"}
{"myfield":"JustForHavingJson","myfield1":"B","myfield2":"C"}
{"myfield":"JustForHavingJson","myfield1":"C","myfield2":""}
{"myfield":"JustForHavingJson","myfield1":"E","myfield2":""}
{"myfield":"JustForHavingJson","myfield1":"X","myfield2":""}
{"myfield":"JustForHavingJson","myfield1":"","myfield2":""}
{"myfield":"JustForHavingJson","myfield1":"D","myfield2":"G"} Personally I wouldn't do a MergeRecord at the end but go on with the three single connections of the UpdateRecord processors. Do you think this could be a possible solution or have you found a better way to do this?
... View more
