Support Questions
Find answers, ask questions, and share your expertise

Can we run Remote Processor Group with multi threading (concurrent tasks)?

Solved Go to solution

Can we run Remote Processor Group with multi threading (concurrent tasks)?

Super Collaborator

Hi, Is there anyway that we can run Remote Processor Group with multi threading (concurrent tasks) in NiFi Site-2-Site.?

Regards,

Sai

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Highlighted

Re: Can we run Remote Processor Group with multi threading (concurrent tasks)?

Master Guru
@Saikrishna Tarapareddy

-

You can increase the number of concurrent tasks on each remote port you have established a connection to:

Once you have your flow established/connected to your Remote Process Group (RPG), right click on the RPG to bring up teh following context menu:

Select "Manage Remote Ports" to open a new UI.

You will then be able to edit each Remote Input/Output you have established connection to:

You will also want to increase the number concurrent tasks on your remote ports as well.

-

Thanks,

Matt

-

When an "Answer" addresses/solves your question, please select "Accept" beneath that answer. This encourages user participation in this forum.

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
Highlighted

Re: Can we run Remote Processor Group with multi threading (concurrent tasks)?

Master Guru
@Saikrishna Tarapareddy

-

You can increase the number of concurrent tasks on each remote port you have established a connection to:

Once you have your flow established/connected to your Remote Process Group (RPG), right click on the RPG to bring up teh following context menu:

Select "Manage Remote Ports" to open a new UI.

You will then be able to edit each Remote Input/Output you have established connection to:

You will also want to increase the number concurrent tasks on your remote ports as well.

-

Thanks,

Matt

-

When an "Answer" addresses/solves your question, please select "Accept" beneath that answer. This encourages user participation in this forum.

View solution in original post