Created 02-24-2016 08:45 AM
Hi all.
We would downgrad Hive 1.2.1 to 0.13.0 ( I mean, after an HDP 2.3 installation we have Hive 1.2.1).
Bacause , before with HDP 2.1 our job run fine and now, with HDP 2.3 we have errors.
We are on Productions and the fast way imho is a simple downgrade only for HIVE.
It's a good idea ? In order to downgrade I read :
The Hive downgrade process reverses the upgrade process:
When finished, validate the downgrade process.
It's correct ? Someone already tested ?
Thanks
Created 02-24-2016 10:18 AM
@Emanuele Parente Downgrade is not a good idea as you will lose tons of new features and performance improvements.
My suggestion is to work on fixing the issue instead downgrading.
Created 02-24-2016 10:18 AM
@Emanuele Parente Downgrade is not a good idea as you will lose tons of new features and performance improvements.
My suggestion is to work on fixing the issue instead downgrading.
Created 02-24-2016 11:08 AM
@Emanuele Parente I suggest that you work with the support to address this issue.
Created 02-24-2016 10:56 AM
Hi @Neeraj Sabharwal. Thanks for you reply.
The issue is related to
https://community.hortonworks.com/questions/18978/hive-121-issue-con-partitioned-table.html
But the main issue is on pre-existent query that when use partition field on WHERE condition cause an error. If the partition field is put in ON clause, the query (with complex left join) works fine.
About ACID transaction (ref. to https://community.hortonworks.com/questions/18978/hive-121-issue-con-partitioned-table.html ), I'm trying to set :
hive.txn.manager=org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.lockmgr.DbTxnManager
hive.compactor.initiator.on=true
hive.compactor.worker.threads=1
but also
hive.support.concurrency=true
hive.enforce.bucketing=true
hive.exec.dynamic.partition.mode=nonstrict
I hope that change something.
Regards,
Emanuele