Created on 08-13-2013 06:55 AM - edited 09-16-2022 01:46 AM
My input path in s3n,
s3n://xxx-xxx/20130813/08
My oozie configuration show as ,
Created 08-28-2013 04:09 AM
@dvohra wrote:This isn't true. Depending on what you're doing with Oozie, S3 is supported just fine as an input or output location.
Doesn't the coordinator expect the input path to be on HDFS as hdfs://{nameNode} is prepended automatically? The workflow.xml is on the HDFS? Isn't the workflow.xml required to be on the HDFS?
Yes unfortunately coordinators currently poll inputs over HDFS alone, which is a limitation. However, writing simple WF actions to work over S3 is still possible.
Yes, WFs should reside on HDFS, as Oozie views it as its central DFS. Similar to how MR requires a proper DFS to run. But this shouldn't impair simple I/O operations done over an external FS such as S3.
I think Romain has covered the relevant JIRAs for tracking removal of this limitation.
Created 08-13-2013 07:06 AM
The link hdfs://xxx.internal:8020/s3n://xxx-xxx/20130813/08 requires a login.
Created 08-13-2013 07:33 AM
Sorry, my question is through Hue in cloudera manager i'm running the oozie job .And I can able to access the hdfs,my question is to connect the another instance Amazon as s3n://xxx to connect ..
Created 08-13-2013 09:19 AM
The input path is required to be to HDFS, not S3. S3 is not the same as HDFS.
Created 08-18-2013 01:39 PM
@dvohra wrote:The input path is required to be to HDFS, not S3. S3 is not the same as HDFS.
This isn't true. Depending on what you're doing with Oozie, S3 is supported just fine as an input or output location.
Created 08-19-2013 03:13 PM
This isn't true. Depending on what you're doing with Oozie, S3 is supported just fine as an input or output location.
Doesn't the coordinator expect the input path to be on HDFS as hdfs://{nameNode} is prepended automatically? The workflow.xml is on the HDFS? Isn't the workflow.xml required to be on the HDFS?
Created 08-28-2013 04:09 AM
@dvohra wrote:This isn't true. Depending on what you're doing with Oozie, S3 is supported just fine as an input or output location.
Doesn't the coordinator expect the input path to be on HDFS as hdfs://{nameNode} is prepended automatically? The workflow.xml is on the HDFS? Isn't the workflow.xml required to be on the HDFS?
Yes unfortunately coordinators currently poll inputs over HDFS alone, which is a limitation. However, writing simple WF actions to work over S3 is still possible.
Yes, WFs should reside on HDFS, as Oozie views it as its central DFS. Similar to how MR requires a proper DFS to run. But this shouldn't impair simple I/O operations done over an external FS such as S3.
I think Romain has covered the relevant JIRAs for tracking removal of this limitation.
Created 01-20-2014 09:05 AM
Created 01-20-2014 09:10 AM
Created 01-20-2014 01:54 PM
Thank you. However I think my question is a little different than that addresses. I am trying to specify an input or output directory in form "s3://..." in an Oozie workflow itself (as an input to a hadoop map reduce job). Do you know if this should work? I get an error that says the path can't have "s3" in it.